Health claims - the Benefits and the Disadvantages

In the world of dietary supplements and health products, the term 'health claim' has become increasingly prominent in recent years. But what are health claims really? Why is regulation around health claims necessary? What are the advantages and disadvantages of these regulations? In this in-depth blog, we explore these questions and look at the future of health claims.

What exactly is a health claim?

A health claim is a claim about the health benefits of a product. These claims are often used in the marketing of foods, dietary supplements and other health products to convince consumers that the product has certain positive health effects. For example, a product may claim that it boosts the immune system or reduces the risk of heart disease. Health claims can range from simple claims about vitamins and minerals to more complex claims about the prevention or treatment of diseases.

What is the purpose of introducing health claim regulation?

The purpose of regulating health claims is to protect consumers from misleading or unsubstantiated claims about the health benefits of products. Without regulation, manufacturers would be free to make claims without scientific evidence to support them. This could lead to consumer confusion and the risk of unsafe or ineffective products. Therefore, strict rules have been put in place to assess and approve health claims before they are placed on product labels or in advertisements.

Who came up with the Health Claim regulations and how are they enforced?

Regulations around health claims vary by region. In the United States, health claims are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In Europe, this is done by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), while in the Netherlands, the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport (VWS) oversees these claims.

Enforcement of these regulations involves assessing scientific evidence submitted by manufacturers to support health claims. Only if there is sufficient evidence that a product actually has the claimed health benefits will the claim be approved for use on product packaging and in advertising.

Who influences the regulations?

The regulation of health claims is influenced by various stakeholders, including manufacturers, consumers, scientists and regulators. Manufacturers are keen to use health claims to make their products more appealing to consumers, but they must adhere to strict rules and evidence. Consumers want honest and accurate information about the products they buy, while scientists and regulators want to ensure that claims are based on solid scientific evidence.

What is the Benefit of Health Claim Regulation?

Regulating health claims has several benefits:

  1. Consumer protection: Regulation ensures that consumers get reliable information about the health benefits of products. They can be confident that claims on product labels are based on scientific evidence.
  2. Scientific validity: Health claims must be supported by sound scientific research. This promotes the accuracy and credibility of information provided to consumers.
  3. Fair competition: Regulation ensures that manufacturers do not gain an unfair advantage by making unsubstantiated health claims. It keeps the market fair and competition based on product quality and effectiveness.
  4. Promoting health: The use of health claims can encourage consumers to make healthier choices and buy products that contribute to their well-being.
  5. Transparency: Regulatory bodies usually publish the scientific basis for approved health claims, providing transparency in the decision-making process.

What is the Disadvantage of Health Claims Regulations?

While the regulation around health claims has important advantages, there are also some disadvantages:

Cost and time for manufacturers

The process of obtaining approval for health claims can be time-consuming and costly for manufacturers. They have to conduct extensive scientific studies and submit the necessary documentation, which can lead to delays in product development and higher production costs.

Limited innovation

The strict requirements for scientific evidence can hamper innovation. Small manufacturers or start-ups may struggle to find the resources to conduct the required studies, which may prevent new and potentially valuable products from reaching the market.

Confusing for consumers

Sometimes consumers can be confused by the many health claims on product packaging. The complexity of the scientific information can be difficult for the general public to understand, leading to distrust of all health claims.

Overregulation

Another disadvantage is the possibility of overregulation. This can happen when regulators are too strict in assessing health claims, underestimating or ignoring legitimate health benefits. This is of particular concern in the complementary care sector, where some treatments may not meet the strict requirements of health claims but may be effective for certain individuals.

The danger of underestimating complementary care

An important aspect of the discussion on health claims is the danger of underestimating complementary care. This form of care often includes alternative approaches and treatments that do not always fit within traditional medical norms. The regulations surrounding health claims can render this sector powerless, while the consequences of these regulations are incalculable.

Many people benefit from complementary care, even if the scientific basis is not yet fully established. It can be a valuable complement to conventional treatments and improve the well-being of individuals. The danger of overregulation is that these complementary approaches are ignored and people who could benefit from them are limited in their choices.

What does the future of this regulation look like?

The future of regulation around health claims is likely to continue to evolve. There will be an ongoing struggle between ensuring consumer protection and promoting innovation in the food and supplement industry.

It is possible that adjustments will be made to make the process of approving health claims more efficient for manufacturers, while maintaining high scientific standards. In addition, there will be more focus on informing consumers on the proper use and interpretation of health claims.

In the future, there may also be more room for complementary care and alternative approaches, as long as they prove safe and effective for certain target groups. This could provide a more balanced approach to health claims, valuing both traditional and complementary care sectors.

In this constantly changing landscape, Meditech Europe, like many other companies and healthcare providers, remains actively involved in the search for and handling of health claims. We are concerned about the increasing stringency of regulations and their potential impact on consumer choices and wellbeing. We remain committed to providing safe and effective products and are always available for questions at info@meditecheurope.nl or by phone at +31527 292 331.

In this rapidly changing world, it is important to think critically about health claims, their regulation and their impact on both consumers and industry. Together, we can strive for a balanced approach that promotes people's health and well-being without hampering innovation.